View Full Version : obama or cameron?
Who would you rather have as el presidente?
Cameron.....
This forum requires that you wait 60 seconds between posts. Please try again in 4 seconds. [lol]
changilass
08-May-10, 19:15
As Cameron couldn't even manage a majority as Prime Minister, what is the point of the question?
As Cameron couldn't even manage a majority as Prime Minister, what is the point of the question?
What is the point of the question?! So many points...just wondering.
I'll opt for Obama just in case I'm accused of being racist. :eek:
Well a PM and President are two different things for start, its not the same role by a different name. Also Obama hates the UK for some weird historical family reason. I rather liked Clinton as the best recent US President.
what about the most recent UK president?
what about the most recent UK president?
Obvious troll is obvious
Who would you rather have as el presidente?
Obama of course.
Obama of course.
Must be a conspiracy!
John Little
09-May-10, 09:47
what about the most recent UK president?
That would be Cromwell.
He had his bad points. :confused
As Cameron couldn't even manage a majority as Prime Minister, what is the point of the question?
Tories 10,683,787
Labour 8,604,358
Libdem 6,827,938 :confused
Tories 10,683,787
Labour 8,604,358
Libdem 6,827,938 :confused
The electorate of the UK is 45,620,982.
If 10,683,787 voted for Tories
Then that means that only 23.4% of UK voters voted for them
And a mere 18.86% voted for New Liebour and therefore the Conservative Party is duly elected.
Eeven a dumb Scouser can work that out [lol]
The electorate of the UK is 45,620,982.
If 10,683,787 voted for Tories
Then that means that only 23.4% of UK voters voted for them
Yes it would be much more convenient and easier to count if we all voted for the same party
Yes it would be much more convenient and easier to count if we all voted for the same party
I thought that they were all the same.
Yes it would be much more convenient and easier to count if we all voted for the same party
So a dictatorship would be better really. Save on 650 MP's expenses & salaries straight away!
No hanging around deciding on how we sort a hung parliament, no worries of the peeps that couldn't vote & save a fortune on elections.
I could see myself as dictator, I'd be pretty cost effective too. I wouldn't claim any expenses, I'd just take a small salary....I think I could more than comfortably get by on 10 MP's salaries, a 90% saving still :eek:
So a dictatorship would be better really. Save on 650 MP's expenses & salaries straight away!
No hanging around deciding on how we sort a hung parliament, no worries of the peeps that couldn't vote 7 save a fortune on elections.
I could see myself as dictator, I'd be pretty cost effective too. I wouldn't claim any expenses, I'd just take a small salary....I think I could more than comfortably get by on 10 MP's salaries, a 90% saving still :eek:
Impeccable logic, you have my vote :cool:
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.