Originally Posted by
BetterTogether
Ive no problems with means testing all benefits if you don't need them and have a reasonable income then I see no reason to lavish public money on you.
If a pensioner has shares, endowments and annuities then they count as income and are taxed accordingly contrary to popular opinion pensioners who go above the tax threshold pay tax, so they are still contributing back to the system.
It is only those who fall below the tax threshold that pay nothing.
What you are suggesting is that people who have paid to enjoy a higher standard of living in old age now be penalised for being frugal in earlier years while those who couldn't or didn't get the same from governement.
I have no problem with those who have always received a lower wage getting a state pension but you can't then remove any benefit from people who have invested into the same system and paid more in tax and national insurance all their working lives being penalised you then remove any reason for them to make provision for themselves.
When it comes to public service pensions I believe they should go to the private markets and buy and invest in their own pensions not rely on enhanced schemes supplied by the public purse.
There is no reason to keep public servants having final salary pensions which aren't available to the wider population.
So we agree to means testing state pension.
Good.
I'm not saying we should stop pensions tomorrow, leaving those who have planned for years for that income.
But we should be starting to phase it out now.
We're up to our necks in debt and need to cut costs.
Public money handed out willy nilly to those who don't need it is a good place to start. Nobody should receive public money solely because of their age.
Last edited by theone; 14-Oct-15 at 13:01.
Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; Nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first.
- Charles de Gaulle
Bookmarks