and this kind of thing cant help!
http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/04/09/bo...6pLid%3D170383
Anyone thinking of getting involved with pre-arranged riots next week, the law enforcement agencies are scowering social media looking for ringleaders to round up in pre-emptive strikes.
Further, long prison sentences will be the order of the day and who knows?, if the police completely lose control, they may er....react badly
and this kind of thing cant help!
http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/04/09/bo...6pLid%3D170383
LOL. I was a fan of Spitting Image. Check this classic one out folks. It's hilarious.
Spitting Image - Tony Blair Interview - YouTube
Where Thatcher failed in many of her policies was that she never thought further than the end of her ( if you look at the spitting Image video) very long nose.
She and her parliament, failed to think ahead, to give any thought to the human cost of many of their policies. The Tory government then - as now - didnt give a toss about the effect their policies would have in the long term. This was because they governed with ideological objectives and not for the benefit of society as a whole. The right to buy was a clear example of that. A lot of people cite Margarets Thatcher's right to buy policy as one of the greatest social changes ever and indeed it was. A whole sector of people for whom home ownership was a dream to which they could only aspire and never realise found themselves able to take the step they had dreamed of and buy their home. Magnificent. A northern lass from a milltown in Lancashire I know fine well how important this policy was to friends, family and neighbours of ours. My nana and grandpa would have loved to have bought their council house. I supported that policy and still do but it was flawed.
Margaret Thatcher showed absolutely no interest in building new affordable homes for rent and so we have been playing catch up ever since. The policy was designed to reduce the burden on the state - the fact that it helped people own their own homes was a side effect not the objective. If the objective was around people and social mobility then built into this policy would have been the need to build more housing to afford more people this opportunity in the future. But it wasnt. So we have people who have no home, and in many areas no right to buy because there is insufficient social housing either to rent or to buy at affordable prices.
Industrial relations was another clear example. Fight the unions - reduce their power and privatise state owned industries - She absolutely did that. But she gave no thought to rebuilding damaged communities,no thought to how we replace lost jobs from heavy and traditional industries with other jobs. No thought to the price society had to pay. She destroyed, she did not seek to improve. What was it that Norman Lamont said under her leadership "Unemployment is a price worth paying". A price worth paying for a group of people to achieve their ideological objectives. She is widely quoted as saying that "There is no such thing as society"this was in an Interview in woman's Own I think. She said there are only people. She completely failed to grasp that for people to be successful, have equality of opportunity and the chance to achieve their true potential then they had to live together in a real society where the richest and poorest are seen as equal and where policies try to help achieve that equality and minimise disadvantage. Society isnt some abstract thing - it is the way we live together and look after each other.
M Swanson is a great fan of Margaret Thatcher and in a recent post on another thread she said
The likes of us!!!!!! I rather think this was the way Margaret Thatcher thought too. That somehow if she had the wherewithall to rise out of her ever so humble background then so could everybody else. she had no understanding of the difficulties faced by people in their everyday lives and this is clearly still seen in the comments on the threads about living on £53 per week. Mrs Thatcher did not empathise. If Mrs Thatcher cared about the effects on PEOPLE and therefore on SOCIETY then she would have had to do things differently but no - ideology was all in the Tory Governments of the 80s as it is today. She talked about the miners as "the enemy within" but they were just people fighting for a way to earn a living and she destroyed that with her ideological agenda. People DIED during and as a result of the Miners strike, poor, hungry, cold and demonised. Do you know people are dying today as a result of welfare reforms? Poor hungry cold and demonised. We have another tory government and another "Enemy Within" in those who are on welfare benefits. We have an ideological drive to reduce the welfare state. there is little or no thought given to the impact of the policies on the health and wellbeing of the poorest, most vulnerable people these policies affect.
Margaret Thatcher changed the labour party too. They were completely unelectable in the early 80s - Michael Foot although intelligent was no match for the Iron Lady, the problems of the Winter of Discontent too recent and they had no ideas other than backwards. Neil Kinnock was better, a step forward but with a foot in traditional socialist values but it was not enough. Labour could only win by choosing a version of the path trodden by Margaret Thatcher - the path that led to votes from a Thatcher influenced "No such thing as society" Me ME MEEEEEEEE generation who believed that society was nothing, that cohesion, state ownership and trade unions were an embarrassing part of their history rather than something which can be harnessed and changed to benefit everyone. We have a labour party who cannot find their Labour roots and so sway as much as a rootless bush in the winds of change.
By all means admire Margaret Thatcher, she was indeed a formidable woman but she wasnt the saviour of Britain. There is a thought that her death and the pantomime which will be her funeral will influence a rise in support of an Independent Scotland. I dont know but We shall see.
Last edited by squidge; 10-Apr-13 at 12:40.
I'd like to mention her state ceremonial funeral for a moment. Ignoring its high cost, she in no way compares to Churchill or the situation he had to deal with/unique state of the government at that time.
There's also the fact that they're ignoring her wishes so they can put on a spectacle - surprised her family aren't complaining, but then some people do love their pomp, bread and circuses and all that. Easy thing to use as a distraction from other more pressing issues I suppose is the thinking.
ahh a bit like the vote for Independence now, and wait and see how it really affects the country in 2016 philosophy.
.People DIED during the Miners strike, poor, hungry, cold and demonised
mmm a bit of a sweeping statement considering , Six picketers died during the strike, and three teenagers (Darren Holmes aged 15 and Paul Holmes and Paul Womersley aged 14) died picking coal from a colliery waste heap in the winter. The deaths of pickets David Jones and Joe Green continue to be viewed with suspicion. Jones was killed in , Nottinghamshire, by a flying brick during fighting between police, pickets, and non-striking miners,while Green was hit by a truck while picketing in Yorkshire. A taxi driver, was killed on 30 November 1984. He had been taking a non-striking miner to work in the Merthyr Vale Colliery, South Wales when two striking miners dropped a concrete post onto his car from a road bridge above. He died at the scene. two miners served a prison sentence for manslaughter.
well you can only hope , although it seems a bit like you are clutching at strawsBy all means admire Margaret Thatcher, she was indeed a formidable woman but she wasnt the saviour of Britain. There is a thought that her death and the pantomime which will be her funeral will influence a rise in support of an Independent Scotland. I dont know but We shall see.
Last edited by equusdriving; 10-Apr-13 at 12:41.
Tend to agree with you here, an old senile lady has died, over 20 years since her own party ditched her, cant see why some people are calling for parties to celebrate her death, thats unseemingly disgusting. However people have memories and like you the phrase, as used after the Falklands, of dealing with the enemy within, was deliberately choosen to demonise people who didn't fit her framed script. Thats the truth, she was divisive, no one nation tory, and her everlasting epitaph will be as the person who declared war on sections of her own country. ( the enemy within ) Oh, Neo liberalism pre dates Thatcher by decades, Schumpeter / hayek et all economic philosophers, was where the ideology came from, she ( tutored by Keith Joseph ) became a zealot of what we now know as neo Liberalism
i cant say i ever liked the iron lady, but i guess she stood up for the country far better than the lying twisted snivelling bunch we have had of late.
but i dont agree with a state funeral . who s going to pay for all that pomp ..... us the taxpayer as per usual.
William Hague mentioned a multi-billion pound sum which Mrs. T saved the country by refusing to pay it to the EU. Mr Hague's reasonable deduction from this was if she could save the country £65 billion pounds, then the cost of a funeral, even on this scale, was comparative peanuts.
I guess, even without a calculator, this makes some kind of sense?
[QUOTE=equusdriving;1019997]and this kind of thing cant help!
http://money.aol.co.uk/2013/04/09/bo...6pLid%3D170383[/QUOT
Aye but this was why the torys privatised it, to pay the wealthy toffs huge directorship fees along with the share take ups and bonuses, they just swap around companys's when things go wrong and say "who me, no" , give me a Sir dom or a Lordship to go along with the other perks no one will notice.
Hating people because of their colour is wrong. And it doesn't matter which colour does the hating. It's just plain wrong.
Muhammad Ali
Yes, saw the following cross my desk and I thought of the .org: The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC), a small group of police and psychiatrists, is monitoring known Thatcher obsessives. They are concerned about those with mental health issues who have fallen through the care net.
Indeed Phill. I blame the failure of Care in the Community.
And the actual figure of 8p per capita, makes even more nonsense of the objections raised by the malcontents. I often wonder how many of the bleaters actually pay tax to begin with. In my experience, they've usually got the loudest mouths.
Anyway, I may need to reduce the 8p, because Mrs Thatcher's family are contributing to the pot. Anybody would think Margaret Hilda had ever asked for any of this.
Indeed. It was that old duffer and nasty piece of work, Heath wot done it. Mind you, I can't help wondering how much would have been saved, if Blair hadn't reneged on his pledge to give us an In/Out referendum, which he could have done anytime throughout 12 years in power. It's galling to think, that he campaigned to be an MP in Sedgfield, when he declared that remaining in the EU would be damaging to Britain's economy, jobs and industry. We're still waiting.
Bookmarks