When Saveman withdrew his item he excercised his right to do so - I see no connection with censorship in that.
I feel that whatever conditions apply to the 'publishing' of literary work should not be of dual standards but just be appropriate, by which I mean suitable. The opinion of suitability may differ from person to person, but surely we can have an acceptable 'bottom line' a 'common denominator' which does not present the present as totally depraved.
Canuck wrote -
"But just as the literature of the day should reflect the decadence, it should also reflect the profound hope that exists within the depravity. That I think is the gift we have to offer to the future. We have the opportunity to express the occasions of hope we see or experience within the day and age in which we live."
I don't feel it necessary for literature to 'reflect the decadence' unless it also balances it with the good. Hopefully, it will be that good which is carried forward so future generations might think better of us. I don't actually see it as a gift - more a duty or responsibility.