Caithness Map :: Links to Site Map Paying too much for broadband? Move to PlusNet broadband and save£££s. Free setup now available - terms apply. PlusNet broadband.  
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34

Thread: Will Caithness die without Dounreay?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Caithness
    Posts
    12,924

    Default

    I've heard that when we all make the exodus out of Caithness then the herring is thinking about making a comeback.
    God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
    Courage to change the things I can,
    And wisdom to know the difference.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    North Shields
    Posts
    2,179

    Default

    [QUOTE=Rheghead;612110]I've heard that when we all make the exodus out of Caithness then the herring is thinking about making a comeback.[/QUOT

    Aye but the EEC fishing fleet will get wind of them and decimate them again.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Halkirk
    Posts
    552

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobinovich View Post
    Would have no problem with that but generating plant really should be built closer to where it's needed - i.e. where the industry & population are. That's one of the problems I have with all the turbines - surely they should be sited nearer to the areas of high demand to minimise tranmission losses.
    Doesn't seem like that will be a problem shortly: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/...ds/8325105.stm

  4. #24

    Default Will Caithness die without Dounreay?

    Dounreay is the biggest employer in the county and it's going to close soon.
    Just be grateful that it has brought wealth to the County over the years, plus of course lots of hot spots, but of course it could have been worse, the only reason it was located here was because they were not sure if it might blow up. May be the Government in Westminster all those years ago, was not to concerned about Caithness or its people, they are probably only interested now in getting of the sinking ship, and keeping as much money as they can carry. As for renewable energy and the millions already invested in Orkney, i am just hoping Caithness may get a few crumbs from the cake.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Wick
    Posts
    606

    Default

    Come on the renewables!

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Caithness
    Posts
    12,924

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redeyedtreefrog View Post
    Come on the renewables!
    Aw c'mon that sounds pretty boring always the same stuff an' all!!
    God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
    Courage to change the things I can,
    And wisdom to know the difference.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    This should be an interesting topic. I plan to stay with this thread to see how things develop for Caithness. I remember Dounreay was a big employer when I was in Thurso.

  8. #28

    Default closing

    well if its closing how soon is soon..?
    Totus EGO postulo ut exsisto gauisus est Deus , meus loving uxor , quod meus kids.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Thurso
    Posts
    4,705

    Default

    Approx. 2025 according to DSRL's website



  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Caithness
    Posts
    270

    Default Once Dounreay has closed

    Reply to tonkatojo

    No point wishing for a new nuclear power station as when built it would employ less than 100 people.

    Less than Tescos!!

  11. #31
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,333

    Default

    I think theyr'e going to build a railway between the planned expanded port of Scrabster and Dounreay for transporting radioactive waste.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Caithness
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Before they will need any railway a storage facility would have to be built in the UK and that is a long time from now.

  13. #33

    Default yeah

    Quote Originally Posted by tonkatojo View Post
    What would the reaction be from the population if we told Salmond where to go, and invited another nuclear company to build another generating reactor and ditch all those ruddy windmills.
    Thats the best idea ive heard in years its about time they realised nuclear power is the way froward and a clean form of energy, those sodding windmills are nothing more than a eyesore at best and not worth anything to anyone except the land owners that have allowed them on

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    La-la Land
    Posts
    2,576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobinovich View Post
    Would have no problem with that but generating plant really should be built closer to where it's needed - i.e. where the industry & population are. That's one of the problems I have with all the turbines - surely they should be sited nearer to the areas of high demand to minimise tranmission losses.
    Maybe wind turbines are better situated where there is more wind?
    Last edited by George Brims; 27-Oct-09 at 00:21. Reason: It's monday and I can't type to save my life

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •