aAt the weekend it was reported in the newspapers that a 10year old autistic boy was being taught in a store cupboard;while a porta cabinwas lying unused outside for him to be taught in.
The said unit cost £50000 to purchase specificaly for him to be safely taught in while not causing upset to him or others.The dispute appeared to be about the instalation of padded walls and special two way glass.It was reported that the school board deemed it a infringment of his human rights,surely being taught in a store cupboard is too.
While they argue over this the boy has been removed and is staying at home.
It is suppose to be every childs right to be educated ,is this not another infringment?
Whether you agree on inclusion or not is not the point of this thread its who decideds an infringment occurs.
If the pupil was asked i bet he'd say he'd rather be in schol,special glass and all.
Bookmarks