What is noticeable in your response is the complete lack of any notion of the extent of your hypocrisy.

You come on here, saying the things you do about the Cook case yet you will not condemn the actions of Curtis who has been convicted of threatening and abusive behaviour. What conclusions do you think anyone reading your comments will draw about your thoughts on Curtis' actions?

You appear to wish to set standards of behaviour which others must adhere to but which do not apply to you. I wonder where you got that idea from!

So, I will ask once more: do you condemn the actions of Mr Curtis?