Are you in favour of large dogs jumping on people?
if the role of the Procurator Fiscal is ....
Procurators Fiscal are civil servants qualified as Solicitors, Solicitor-Advocates, or Advocates and are independent prosecutors, constitutionally responsible to the Lord Advocate. They receive and consider reports from the Police and over 40 other agencies and decide whether or not to raise criminal proceedings in the public interest. The Procurators Fiscal (and Procurators Fiscal Depute) prosecute all criminal cases in the sheriff courts.
then how did this case ever get to court ?
and how can you 'sustain' a small scratch ? people sustain injuries, not scratches
Are you in favour of large dogs jumping on people?
I did wonder the same thing myself when I read about it.
I have two large dogs that like to make a fuss of people they meet and its hard to temper the border line between what some folk interpretations between a mad dog and a daft dog that wants to say hi.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears.
It's all down to the training of the dog.
W.A.T.P.
I don't think it is borderline at at all. Unless you know the person is okay with it then don't let the dog do it. I am an animal lover, including dogs, but for several reasons having a dog jump up to say hi makes me really uncomfortable. I am too polite to say anything but if the owner took one look at my face instead of gushing about how cute their dogs are and how they must like me they would see that.
Saying that I agree the case mentioned is crazy and thought as much when I read it.
That was the point I was making, I understand that not everyone shares the same liking for dogs and a good recall is the most important training for any dog.
I was just very surprised that this got to court when you consider all the bad things that go on without justice being dealt.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears.
Think its an absolute joke to be going to court over something like that, if the dog had bitten and was aggressive fair enough.
No matter how much training you try to give to an animal sometimes they just get excited, god it was a wee scratch no like she got rabies from it or anything, complete over reaction and waste of police and joe public time and money.
It is against the law to have a dog dangerously out of control in a public place.
"Dangerously out of control" is defined as if it "injures someone" or if it "makes someone worried they might be injured".
Whatever your views on what constitutes fair use of court time, the dog was out of control, the law was broken and the owner admitted the law was broken.
Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; Nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first.
- Charles de Gaulle
I wonder what the owners reaction had been if the person in fear of the dog kicked it square in the face to make it retreat?
W.A.T.P.
personally i think there was an underlying tension here and one prob saw the opportunity to get one over on the other party, pathetic it coming to court as there i am sure more pressing matters to be heard
Ridiculous that this ever went to court. Like someone else has already said, it was a total overreaction and waste of public money.
Some people are to quick to judge.
As the owner of the dog plead guilty at the last minute, the female, who was "scratched" as she was trying to stop the Dalmatian attacking her small dog, nor her friend who also witnessed the attack, were allowed to give evidence and the journalist who wrote this story only heard the accused side. Unfortunately another misleading article from the local press.
Nothing misleading about it. The dog owner knew they were guilty so pled guilty.
Jings here we go again!
This went to trial and wasted all our money and some peoples time as the dog owner at the first hearing plead "not guilty". As I said the press only reported a small portion of this case hence my statement "Unfortunately another misleading article from the local press".
Bookmarks