Originally Posted by
rob murray
Squidge Im not witch hunting but Hyslop has not definitively stated what the grant is for, true it followed due process, but Dempsies role can be seen as a conflict of interest ie given SNP ties / MSP aspirations she worked for the promoters and set ythe meeting up although Hyslop has problems remembering what e mails she avctually read etc etc . Mary Scanlon would not have asked for the docs yesterday surely, and how she can make sense of 600 plus pages in a couple of hours is beyond me, but I dont know for sure. TRuth is T may well have exerted some "threat" on moving out of Scotland, hence the "grant" could be seen as a back hander ie a sweetner towards any additional costs with the new venue....in my view. Basically a lack of clarity all round
Bookmarks