Caithness Map :: Links to Site Map Paying too much for broadband? Move to PlusNet broadband and save£££s. Free setup now available - terms apply. PlusNet broadband.  
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 61 to 76 of 76

Thread: A9 to be fitted with average speed cameras

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Reay
    Posts
    1,086

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alrock View Post
    £2.5 Million?

    Would it not be cheaper & easier to just paint more arrows on the road to help avoid the confusion some seem to suffer with a road that constantly switches between duel & single carriageway?

    Agreed ! Having been up and down the A90 this week between Dundee and Aberdeen, I see its fitted with lots of fixed speed cameras. That works fine and most cars just cruise along under the speed limit. The road is all dual carriageway and 70mph bar one short stretch past a junction at 50mph. For me that would be far preferable and most cost-effective for the A9 than use of average speed cameras.
    Green but not brainwashed

    Using the sun to provide hot water.
    Driving a car that gets 73 miles per gallon.....

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Highlands
    Posts
    3,124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Green_not_greed View Post
    Agreed ! Having been up and down the A90 this week between Dundee and Aberdeen, I see its fitted with lots of fixed speed cameras. That works fine and most cars just cruise along under the speed limit. The road is all dual carriageway and 70mph bar one short stretch past a junction at 50mph. For me that would be far preferable and most cost-effective for the A9 than use of average speed cameras.
    My preferred option would be an unrestricted stretch of 3 lane motorway from Inverness to Glasgow and Edinburgh
    W.A.T.P.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Reay
    Posts
    1,086

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mi16 View Post
    My preferred option would be an unrestricted stretch of 3 lane motorway from Inverness to Glasgow and Edinburgh
    Unfortunately on planet Earth that's not an option! Even the major motorways between central belt cities are 2 lanes each way.
    Green but not brainwashed

    Using the sun to provide hot water.
    Driving a car that gets 73 miles per gallon.....

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Highlands
    Posts
    3,124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Green_not_greed View Post
    Unfortunately on planet Earth that's not an option! Even the major motorways between central belt cities are 2 lanes each way.
    There are plenty 3 lane motorways in the UK.Anyhow no point in debating any options the SPECS system has been rubber stamped and that is that.
    W.A.T.P.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Wick
    Posts
    3,849

    Default

    Had a wee trundle up and down the A9 today. Heading South we witnessed one woman make 4 outrageous overtaking manoeuvres, each time having to force herself back into the line of traffic narrowly escaping head on collisions. We were travelling 40 to 48 in a 60 zone.
    Heading back North I had to slam on to avoid a head on going round a bend, vehicle in my lane on a blind bend overtaking in a 30 zone. (they may have been exceeding 30)

    It's dickhead cameras we need, but, been saying this for years.


  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Highlands
    Posts
    3,124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phill View Post
    Had a wee trundle up and down the A9 today. Heading South we witnessed one woman make 4 outrageous overtaking manoeuvres, each time having to force herself back into the line of traffic narrowly escaping head on collisions. We were travelling 40 to 48 in a 60 zone.
    Heading back North I had to slam on to avoid a head on going round a bend, vehicle in my lane on a blind bend overtaking in a 30 zone. (they may have been exceeding 30)

    It's dickhead cameras we need, but, been saying this for years.
    Was this on the future SPECS stretch or north of Inverness?
    W.A.T.P.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Wick
    Posts
    3,849

    Default

    North of Inverness this time, however typical of the sort of thing witnessed on single sections Inverness to Perth.


  8. #68
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Caithness
    Posts
    12,924

    Default

    In my experience, if you impove the road then you just encourage more people to use it then it requires another improvement. Is improving roads really a sensible option?
    God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
    Courage to change the things I can,
    And wisdom to know the difference.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Wick
    Posts
    3,849

    Default

    Depends how many dead people you want I suppose.


  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Highlands
    Posts
    3,124

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rheghead View Post
    In my experience, if you impove the road then you just encourage more people to use it then it requires another improvement. Is improving roads really a sensible option?
    Hmm interesting theory there, lets dig up the roads and go back to cart tracks.
    W.A.T.P.

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,321

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ywindythesecond View Post
    Eh? Sorry, don't understand.
    Traffic management cameras can only be sited where there is higher than average number of accidents so for them to be installed on the A9 there must be a record of accident statistics which allows those in charge to do so. However, if the road is subsequently upgraded to dual carriageway it become a 'new' road and there will not be sufficient statistical data recorded to continue the use of the cameras in that area, therefore they would have to be removed.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Wick
    Posts
    3,849

    Default

    SPECS on dual sections aren't really an issue. But I am dubious as to any real benefit on the single sections where we'll see more HGV's topping out at 40 MPH etc. Whilst speed is often a contributory factor in the resulting accidents, often the cause is poor decision making prior to a manoeuvre, usually an overtaking move on single carriageway.


  13. #73
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,651

    Default

    I would expect the SPECS cameras to pretty much eliminate overtaking making it much safer, although it will be a bit tedious playing follow the leader from Inverness to Perth.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Wick
    Posts
    3,849

    Default

    The glorious A9 yesterday. Think we were getting 28Mph here. Lost count of the number of mental suicidal manoeuvres.




    SPECS themselves probably wouldn't be an issue. The overall average speed often comes out well below 60 if the whole length is taken into account. A lot will depend on how SPECS details HGV's and over what sections the average is taken into account.

    Stopping numpties trying to expand the laws of physics is another issue.


  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,651

    Default

    I'd like to know how you were taking those photo's without dropping your fag and spilling your coffee?

  16. #76
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Wick
    Posts
    780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ducati View Post
    I'd like to know how you were taking those photo's without dropping your fag and spilling your coffee?
    Ii dunno Phill, you have some serious driving skill set what with driving a car, drinking coffee, smoking a ciggie AND managing to take pics making it look like you were in the passenger seat too!

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •