?????? eh ?????
.....many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Is it discriminatory that I think it's 63,360 and other people think it's 4 or maybe 100,000? What about the 36,640 angels that can't dance on the head of the pin I'm using but apparently can on the pin that other people are using?
Is their free speech being constrained if they can't complain?
Should social workers be involved?
Does anyone care?
Should anyone care?
?????? eh ?????
What you on about.
Quality
you have lost us j4bberw0ck.
Pin heads can vary in size... care to share the dimensions of the Pin head you are referring to?
Si vis Pacem, Para bellum...
According to this Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angels_on_a_pin the most commonly accepted answer is ... {pi squared}/6.
Si vis Pacem, Para bellum...
But how many camels, bearing wise men, can pass through the eye of a needle?
Seems there is a wiki for almost everything now....
Sorry, peeps......
I'd just read through the "I have strong views about immigration" thread and some of the belly-button-gazing wafflings and was reminded of similar great debates in history; like how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, and whether boiled eggs should be eaten from the big end or the little end:
Evidently I owe everyone an apology again for my sense of (alleged) humour .Originally Posted by Jonathan Swift, Gulliver's Travels, published 1726
I think Wiki has grown too big and out of control from its original purpose. As a result the site's owners allow contributions from any Tom, Dick and Harry. As a result, a lot of their facts cannot be substantiated in fact and therefore cannot be trusted. A sad pickle for what was a great encyclopedia.
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
Courage to change the things I can,
And wisdom to know the difference.
The people involved with various wiki's tend to dislike anyone actually adding to it or correcting mistakes. There is one in particular 'editor' who has threatened me with banning my wkik account over my attempts to improve his wiki.
It does still ahve a future but I believe (and I have fallen for this myself) a lot of people take what is written in the same light as they might if they referred to a hard back encyclopedia. But then I dare say some critics would even question the veracity of what is written down on paper...
cough cough ops that was splutter splutter... open mind is what is needed... pokes my belly yep going down slowly not wobbling so much ... nuttin wrong wea things dancing on pins lol
WoRdS ShOuLd Be SiMpLe An VoIcEs SoFt !!!
Whats going on in here....??
Im totally lost, anyone want to share whats going on but in a way that us not so cleaver ones will understand...
Thanks,
.Orger
Bookmarks