I'm a little disappointed, but not surprised, that they never won. With the corruption in FIFA it's no surprise Russia and Qatar won.
It would have been great having a major tournament on our doorstep.
England is out thank goodness. We will now not be hearing about it for the next eight years as would have been if they did win.
I'm a little disappointed, but not surprised, that they never won. With the corruption in FIFA it's no surprise Russia and Qatar won.
It would have been great having a major tournament on our doorstep.
I agree.
Lottery funding in this country has been so squeezed by the Olympics that less is available to spend on other things.
Something I have never understood though.
Why does the UK have four separate national teams?
I mean - I am not a fan of football and I don't follow sport.
But it does seem to me, complete ignoramus that I am, that a British football team would sweep all before it.
Oh Dear !
C3...
Who said they were regions of England? Where does that come from?
We are a sort of federal state with one central government that handles all our foreign affairs and defence.
Switzerland is a federation of cantons speaking French, German, Italians and Romansch. But they do sport as Switzerland.
When there was a place called Czechoslovakia there was a Czechoslovakian team.
If it is ok for us to have four teams, why could they not have had a Czech team and a Slovak team? Or why can any federal state containing different nations not have the same?
I am not asking this with any irony in mind. I genuinely do not know.
As far as I know the UK is the only state in the world which fields more than one team.
How did that happen?
*sigh*
It happened when FIFA was formed. They recognised the importance of the British associations' part in developing modern football, and awarded each association a life-long place on the FIFA General Committee (or whatever it's called).
If any of the home nations were to merge with the other, they'd lose their exalted place on this committee, after all, all national teams are run by their own football association. That's why it's called 'Association Football'.
Not only would British football be worse off, due to the lessened control over World Football, but Europe's would too.
Plus, nobody wants to lose their national team.
"It makes my blood burn with metal energy..."
The reason for separate teams is historical.
The first international football match was Scotland v England.
We've had separate asscoiations, leagues and cups for longer than the world cup has existed.
This is not an issue of unionism or nationalism, just of history.
Thankyou.
I have learned something.
I think England and Scotland should do a joint bid for next time, share the glory about (if everyone isn't too proud that is) ...
Everyday above ground is a good day
Next time has already been awarded to Qatar (yes that famous centre of footballing legends)
Apparently the temperatures reach 50 degrees centigrade in Qatar, really good for quality football playing!!
I would think the term "BID" is most appropriate for describing the process involved!!
England are only an average side, yet scarcely one or two Scots or Welshmen would be up to selection - I can't think of one Ulsterman who migh contend. A U.K. team would win nowt.
Incidentally, the UK has four separate 'Football Associations' each with autonomy and vested interest. As an Englishman myself I have no wish to see a 'United Kingdom' team - however, I'd quite like to see the Home Chamionships reinstated as a serious competition
Michael Stone is innocent.
Convicted without any forensic evidence and failed to be picked at any ID parade
So who did kill Lin & Megan Russell
http://www.michaelstone.co.uk/
Qatar for 2022.
A team thats never qualified for the World Cup with a population of 1.5 million.
50 degrees temps and 10 x 50000+ capacity stadiums to be built in an area similar in size to the highlands.
It's amazing what oil can buy.
Bookmarks