Caithness Map :: Links to Site Map Paying too much for broadband? Move to PlusNet broadband and save£££s. Free setup now available - terms apply. PlusNet broadband.  
Page 9 of 48 FirstFirst ... 567891011121319 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 180 of 954

Thread: Wick Academy Development Fund

  1. #161
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sherbets
    Posts
    2,768

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katarina View Post
    What about the bignold park?
    Aren't there all sorts of ownership and existing user issues there?

    However, it may be that the new Sports Complex is best combined with any new school/ pool/ library/ performance centre complex, to get the benefit of common services and minimising maintenance costs etc. Also one single REALLY impressive community facility, swarming with people all the time...

    For the community to be very proud of.

    But what to call it?
    Working On Behalf Of The Community!

  2. #162
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sherbets
    Posts
    2,768

    Default

    Still loads of views but not so many posts now. Is it getting boring? Are we losing interest? Don't make me feel sad & lonely, folks!?

    What facilities should it have?

    I'll start us off with a proper 8-lane 400m running track. With 500 tiered seats.

    And proper gates to stop folk letting their dowgs poop on the grass!
    Working On Behalf Of The Community!

  3. #163

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tubthumper View Post
    Still loads of views but not so many posts now. Is it getting boring? Are we losing interest? Don't make me feel sad & lonely, folks!?

    What facilities should it have?

    I'll start us off with a proper 8-lane 400m running track. With 500 tiered seats.

    And proper gates to stop folk letting their dowgs poop on the grass!
    If it was to develop WAFC , there shouldnt be a running track anywhere near the pitch Im afraid to say. But if it is to benefit the community, by all means have a running track but remeember theres £200,000 + not £2 million which they would need going by your plans
    Cmey e Scorries

  4. #164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tubthumper View Post
    What would be a good name for our new sports complex? 'Wick Community Sports Centre' sounds a bit bland to me. We could give it:

    • A Viking name (exciting, promotes our heritage)
    • A Gaelic name (promotes our gaelic/ clearance heritage)
    • A totally random designation (exciting for the kids)
    • A name associated with the ground it's built on
    Alternatively we could do the tradition thing and name it after:

    • A famous local person
    • Telford or Stevenson, the architects of Wick (well, bits of it)
    • A local politician or dignitary
    • A weel-kent local worthy
    • One of the committee who have made it possible
    • The landowner who donates the ground for it

    The Jacky Gunn centre of Sporting excellence.
    Cmey e Scorries

  5. #165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amy-Winehouse View Post
    If it was to develop WAFC , there shouldnt be a running track anywhere near the pitch Im afraid to say. But if it is to benefit the community, by all means have a running track but remeember theres £200,000 + not £2 million which they would need going by your plans

    With the £2 million or whatever monies there is currently in the bank you could use this to apply to organisations for match funding. This would double your money overnight if successful.

    The key to this is the committee need to be regularly meeting, discussing and acting on what they want to achieve.

    and letting others know

  6. #166
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sherbets
    Posts
    2,768

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amy-Winehouse View Post
    If it was to develop WAFC , there shouldnt be a running track anywhere near the pitch Im afraid to say. But if it is to benefit the community, by all means have a running track but remeember theres £200,000 + not £2 million which they would need going by your plans
    We need to have a discussion about what our new centre will be for. No point in trying to serve everyone's demands and ending up with something that's rubbish for most things.

    The fund was originally intended primarily to develop Wick (and by extension, Caithness) football. Football does seem to be the dominant sport up here. So should we be concentrating on providing a better football stadium with superb community outdoor training facilities? (to complement the mainly indoor facilities that Halkirk are developing)
    Working On Behalf Of The Community!

  7. #167
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sherbets
    Posts
    2,768

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amy-Winehouse View Post
    The Jacky Gunn centre of Sporting excellence.
    OK, that's a start. Has this individual excelled at some sport? Or are they a well-known local philanthropist?
    Working On Behalf Of The Community!

  8. #168
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Is it just me or is anyone else disappointed to say the least that messrs Gunn & Carter and the secret committee have not bothered to provide any information as to the progress of our sports centre.

    Not only are they ignoring the requests on this forum and we know they are watching but they have also ignored the request from Jamie Stone MSP printed in the local paper a few weeks back.

    All said and done they were "close" to having everything in place back in 2002 so what has happened in the last 8 years?

  9. #169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wario View Post
    Is it just me or is anyone else disappointed to say the least that messrs Gunn & Carter and the secret committee have not bothered to provide any information as to the progress of our sports centre.

    Not only are they ignoring the requests on this forum and we know they are watching but they have also ignored the request from Jamie Stone MSP printed in the local paper a few weeks back.

    All said and done they were "close" to having everything in place back in 2002 so what has happened in the last 8 years?

    Have you asked Jamie Stone if he got a response?
    We should wait and see what is provided in response to Tubthumper's request for information.

  10. #170
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sherbets
    Posts
    2,768

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wario View Post
    Is it just me or is anyone else disappointed to say the least that messrs Gunn & Carter and the secret committee have not bothered to provide any information as to the progress of our sports centre.
    The arrogance is simply stunning
    Quote Originally Posted by Wario View Post
    Not only are they ignoring the requests on this forum and we know they are watching but they have also ignored the request from Jamie Stone MSP printed in the local paper a few weeks back.
    But as the 'chairman' explained, he would reveal the truth when it suited him. We matter nowt.
    Quote Originally Posted by Wario View Post
    All said and done they were "close" to having everything in place back in 2002 so what has happened in the last 8 years?
    I'll stick my neck out and sum it up:

    • Money raised - c. £250 000
    • Designs for centre commissioned - none
    • Land acquired for complex - none
    • Interaction with highland council - none
    • Discussions with local groups re requirements - none
    • Interactions with funding bodies - none
    • Individuals in community pleased - none
    • Individuals in 'committee' pleased - 6
    Working On Behalf Of The Community!

  11. #171
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Thurso and Keiss
    Posts
    266

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tubthumper View Post
    We need to have a discussion about what our new centre will be for. No point in trying to serve everyone's demands and ending up with something that's rubbish for most things.

    The fund was originally intended primarily to develop Wick (and by extension, Caithness) football. Football does seem to be the dominant sport up here. So should we be concentrating on providing a better football stadium with superb community outdoor training facilities? (to complement the mainly indoor facilities that Halkirk are developing)
    In the present circumstances, perhaps its a little premature to be thinking about what the proposed new centre will be used for, but I would caution against placing too much emphasis on football, as this would exclude a large proportion of the public

  12. #172
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gollach View Post
    Have you asked Jamie Stone if he got a response?
    We should wait and see what is provided in response to Tubthumper's request for information.
    The request from Jamie Stone MSP published in the Groat on 9 July was a follows "A CALL was made this week for the Caithness public to be told how much money is in the Wick Academy Development Fund, what it is to be used for and what progress is being made with regard to its aims being met"

    As we the Caithness public are no further on about of the points Mr Stone raised i think it is fair to say they are ignoring him as well as us.

  13. #173
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sherbets
    Posts
    2,768

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Happy Guy View Post
    In the present circumstances, perhaps its a little premature to be thinking about what the proposed new centre will be used for, but I would caution against placing too much emphasis on football, as this would exclude a large proportion of the public
    That's a fair point. While we're (still) waiting, why don't the public give an indication here about what they'd like to see included?
    Working On Behalf Of The Community!

  14. #174
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sherbets
    Posts
    2,768

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wario View Post
    As we the Caithness public are no further on about of the points Mr Stone raised i think it is fair to say they are ignoring him as well as us.
    That's one of the great things about having a secret 'committee' of 'trustees' and membership by invitation only. You can treat everyone with complete contempt.

    How they've continued to get away with it is probably down to the community's 'live and let live' attitude, and our inherent trust in the integrity of our fellow man.

    Well we got caught bonny with the Gala funds, didn't we!?
    Last edited by Tubthumper; 01-Aug-10 at 20:14.
    Working On Behalf Of The Community!

  15. #175
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    extreme north of Scotland
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    personally I don't care what it's used for as long as it's used for something other than lining the secret committee's pockets! Secret committee! this is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard of. the people of wicK have just been too trusting, and past experience should learn us not to be so again.
    Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.

  16. #176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tubthumper View Post
    The arrogance is simply stunning

    But as the 'chairman' explained, he would reveal the truth when it suited him. We matter nowt.
    I'll stick my neck out and sum it up:

    • Money raised - c. £250 000
    • Designs for centre commissioned - none
    • Land acquired for complex - none
    • Interaction with highland council - none
    • Discussions with local groups re requirements - none
    • Interactions with funding bodies - none
    • Individuals in community pleased - none
    • Individuals in 'committee' pleased - 6
    Sorry Tubs you missed one out
    [*] Requests to local groups turned down and disappointed - a few

    Quote Originally Posted by Tubthumper View Post

    Well we got caught bonny with the Gala funds, didn't we!?
    Time and time again local funds have been used and abused by its members this has been going on now for many years some brought to justice others got away with it !

    I would have thought that this would have made any committee try doubly hard to be as open as possible to the public whose money they have in their care.

  17. #177

    Default

    I've been away and have just been catching up on here. I checked the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005, Chapter 3, Section 23, "Entitlement to information about charities" and there is no mention of any time limit for a response...so i'm afraid that it's neither 14 working days or 14 days. Patience may be required by all !!

  18. #178
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,651

    Default

    Inspired by my recent visit to the Halkirk Highland Games (where the Jocks were comprehensively beaten by an Australian), might I venture a thought that we should include facilities for the more traditional highland pastimes.

    Only joking, a magnificent display by all the competitors

  19. #179
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sherbets
    Posts
    2,768

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Archer View Post
    I've been away and have just been catching up on here. I checked the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005, Chapter 3, Section 23, "Entitlement to information about charities" and there is no mention of any time limit for a response...so i'm afraid that it's neither 14 working days or 14 days. Patience may be required by all !!
    You're very good The Archer. But what you must remember is that if the WADF prevaricate any further, you're likely to lose the trust of the community you're allegedly 'Working On Behalf Of'.

    Also the OSCR will not be very happy (remember the previous investigation?).

    So the WADF had better get the finger out, as they say.
    Working On Behalf Of The Community!

  20. #180

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Archer View Post
    I've been away and have just been catching up on here. I checked the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005, Chapter 3, Section 23, "Entitlement to information about charities" and there is no mention of any time limit for a response...so i'm afraid that it's neither 14 working days or 14 days. Patience may be required by all !!
    I agree that the 14 days ruling is not mentioned in this section............however I think that the people involved with the WADF would be only too happy to supply by return this information.

    If on the other hand they decide not too I am sure our good friend Tubs and a few others will be banging on the door of OSCR who can then ask for information and they have to get a response within 14 days for their request............. I think from my reading of the prior paragraph. ( unless I have read it wrong )


    A group with nothing to hide have no need to hold onto any information regarding public monies. ( have they now?? )

Page 9 of 48 FirstFirst ... 567891011121319 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •