Caithness Map :: Links to Site Map Paying too much for broadband? Move to PlusNet broadband and save£££s. Free setup now available - terms apply. PlusNet broadband.  
Page 48 of 48 FirstFirst ... 384445464748
Results 941 to 944 of 944

Thread: Wick Academy Development Fund

  1. #941


    Dan Mackay has been offered the opportunity to attend the next RBWCC meeting to be enlightend to the facts of RBWCC intervention as a Voluntary Organisation to the benefit of the inhabitants of Wick. This is in compliance with WADF annual report for 2015 and their intention to reconsider their options following completion of the new Community Facilities.

    A group is being formed with the intention of refurbishing the King George V park and approached WADF, again totally in compliance with WADF aims and objective available on their OSCR website.

    The Hogmanay Party committee have never approached WADF for funding for their 'hooley', nows thats complete 'codswallup'

    RBWCC is open to all, next meeting first Monday of October if anyone wants the facts.
    Last edited by Camra; 24-Sep-17 at 18:06. Reason: spelling error
    I kent his faither

  2. #942
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Wick, Caithness


    The Royal Burgh of Wick Community Council have attempted to get things moving with some questions to Wick Academy Development Fund. A valiant attempt that has been rebuffed -
    The Royal Burgh of Wick Community Council submitted the undernoted questions to Wick Academy Development Fund following a report in the Caithness Courier of 6th September 2017 which quoted WADF Chairman Jacky Gunn as saying "If the Community Council want to write a letter to us with the questions they want answered, we will consider them." the questions were sent to WADF under cover of a letter dated 2nd October 2017 their response dated 10th January 2018 is also shown below.

    See the Wick Community council Facebook page

  3. #943


    Those are good and reasonable questions. I wonder if, rather than approaching OSCR / HMRC, that answers should be compelled by the court?

  4. #944



    I refer to Judith Hayhow’s email to you on 8 December 2017 and am writing with reference to the contact form you submitted online asking OSCR to provide responses we have made in relation to inquiries submitted against Wick Academy Development Fund (the charity).

    OSCR continues to have a long running inquiry into Wick Academy Development Fund. We are aware that the charity has raised considerable funds but has not yet used them to further its purposes and that the charity’s 2016 accounts are overdue for submission to OSCR. I can confirm that concerns have been raised with us about the charity and that we do have concerns about its operation. We cannot however discuss these with a third party.

    Jennifer Keenlyside | Senior Inquiry Officer | 01382 346870 | |
    I kent his faither

Page 48 of 48 FirstFirst ... 384445464748

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts