Caithness Map :: Links to Site Map Paying too much for broadband? Move to PlusNet broadband and save£££s. Free setup now available - terms apply. PlusNet broadband.  
Page 1 of 38 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 745

Thread: Nato strike kills a number of Afghanistan civilians

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Closer than you think
    Posts
    1,427

    Default Nato strike kills a number of Afghanistan civilians

    A "number" is 33 dead
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8527627.stm

    As aAdolf Eichmann once said about holocaust.
    "..10 is a lot, 100 more and anything over that is a statistic.." (or words to that effect)

    And this was not even in area where NATO is engaged in a large offensive

    We reap what we sow

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    In close orbit
    Posts
    4,584

    Default

    Innocent people get killed in every conflict across the planet.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Strathy
    Posts
    4,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anfield View Post
    And this was not even in area where NATO is engaged in a large offensive We reap what we sow
    "Reap what we sow" - same comment for any war/conflict?

    Don't really understand why you've brought the Nazi holocaust into it!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,651

    Default

    I have a worry here. (Apart obviously from the appalling loss of life).

    I am reasonably aware of the many air sorties being carried out across Afghanistan and there nature has been of close air support. So a GR4 or whatever would be called by ground forces for a show of strength or as a last resort a bomb or missile run on a target that was an immediate threat.

    Without knowing what was the action being engaged in here, it appears to me that this is more akin to strategic bombing, if NATO are targeting the movement of insurgents.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Strathy
    Posts
    4,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ducati View Post
    Without knowing what was the action being engaged in here, it appears to me that this is more akin to strategic bombing, if NATO are targeting the movement of insurgents.
    'A Nato statement said it was thought the convoy contained Taliban insurgents on their way to attack Afghan and foreign military forces.' (From Link above #1)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bekisman View Post
    'A Nato statement said it was thought the convoy contained Taliban insurgents on their way to attack Afghan and foreign military forces.' (From Link above #1)
    Yes thanks for that. So I thought the usual use of air power would be to wait untill they actually were attacking so poss. seeing a shift in tactics?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Closer than you think
    Posts
    1,427

    Default

    The connection to Holocaust is to show how immune we have come to the killing of innocent people.
    .
    The people who died were in three minibuses travelling in convoy in daylight. I doubt this is how resistance fighters travel

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Strathy
    Posts
    4,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anfield View Post
    The connection to Holocaust is to show how immune we have come to the killing of innocent people.
    .
    The people who died were in three minibuses travelling in convoy in daylight. I doubt this is how resistance fighters travel
    Holocaust: Premeditated Murder
    Afghanistan: misidentification - unintentional

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Isn't "news" a funnny thing.

    We are now getting a string of headline news stories when there is a civilian death in Afghanistan, yet about 500,000 civilians lost their lives as a result of the Iraq invasion. Are they the 'un-people' then, and therefore no need to report on them ?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ducati View Post
    Yes thanks for that. So I thought the usual use of air power would be to wait untill they actually were attacking so poss. seeing a shift in tactics?
    No, it's the same old tactics, one dead American soldier and there is outcry at home but kill as many Afghani women and children as you like, it aint gonna lose us any votes.

    The message to Afghanis is simple, stay at home and you get your house bombed just in case there is a resistance fighter in there. Try to make it to safety and get your vehicles bombed on the off chance you are resistance fighters on their way to attack us.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,651

    Default

    Ignoring Fred's usual. The BBC news (telly) reported an investigation has been called into whether this strike adhered to rules of engagement.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ducati View Post
    Ignoring Fred's usual. The BBC news (telly) reported an investigation has been called into whether this strike adhered to rules of engagement.
    Like the investigation into the rogue missile that killed a Afghani family earlier this month? They found that the missile wasn't faulty, it was aimed at the family, carry on as normal lads.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUST...2F+Top+News%29

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bekisman View Post
    Holocaust: Premeditated Murder
    Afghanistan: misidentification - unintentional
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QUhp...layer_embedded

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,651

    Default

    I can imagine you cackling away singing I told you so, I told you so.

    Actually that link looked interesting but I cant do Video off web.
    Last edited by ducati; 22-Feb-10 at 16:41.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fred View Post
    No, it's the same old tactics, one dead American soldier and there is outcry at home but kill as many Afghani women and children as you like, it aint gonna lose us any votes.

    The message to Afghanis is simple, stay at home and you get your house bombed just in case there is a resistance fighter in there. Try to make it to safety and get your vehicles bombed on the off chance you are resistance fighters on their way to attack us.
    I think that is (among many) the most stupid thing you've said.

    Hearts and minds is the strategy. This is the last thing needed.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ducati View Post
    I think that is (among many) the most stupid thing you've said.

    Hearts and minds is the strategy. This is the last thing needed.
    Then the sooner we realise you don't win hearts and minds with hellfire missiles the better.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Strathy
    Posts
    4,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fred View Post
    carry on as normal lads.
    "Carry on as usual lads" - what an insult coming from you. You've no idea of the mindset of 'these lads' - pity you have no personal experience of 'war' - one tends to think you would not be cackling then..

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,613

    Default

    You know Fred, I read your posts and in my opinion you do have some good points.
    Within the rules of engagement....made up as one goes along... dependent upon the circumstances.
    Similar to heavy water released at a Nuke plant, or contaminated air....after 72 hours or so as it has dissipated..now within acceptable limits....
    Yes collatoral damage....but why are we there?? Could it be the almighty Oil??
    And guess what...we, as the average person will never know.
    Aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...it's too complicated....

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    In close orbit
    Posts
    4,584

    Default

    Well, lets' disband the all armed forces and then we won't be able to rampage around the planet deliberately slaughtering thousands of civilians.

    There's a simple answer to those who point and shout every time civvies get killed in a conflict that they personally disagree with.

    Job done.


  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Closer than you think
    Posts
    1,427

    Default

    So it's ok to kill someone providing that it is done withing the "Rules of engagement" What a completely stupid supposition.

    Wars are fought on a simple basis - kill or be killed.

    You play to your strengths, We bomb from the air and the other side use IED's (improvised explosive device).

Page 1 of 38 1234511 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •