PDA

View Full Version : DLA TO PIP MEDICAL BONANZA, If you receive DLA then this will be of interest to you.



Kodiak
08-May-12, 23:34
DLA TO PIP MEDICAL BONANZA

Disability living allowance (DLA) claimants have been divided into four regional lots and are being sold off to ten shortlisted bidders – including multinational security companies - for the purpose of being medically assessed for personal independence payment.

A fifth, nationwide lot is also up for grabs, but the DWP have said they do not intend to use this contract unless things go wrong with regional suppliers.

PIP is due to begin replacing DLA for working age claimants from spring next year, with all current DLA claimants having to be reassessed for the new benefit. The contracts for PIP medicals are worth up to a billion pounds in total and have attracted the attention of many multinational companies.

Amongst the bidders through to the final round in all four regions is the increasingly heavily criticised Atos, who will undoubtedly be hoping that their LIMA software will give them the edge over their rivals.

Relative newcomers to the scene are security guards G4S, who have also been shortlisted for every contract. Their forensic medical arm, though more used to helping catch rapists and paedophiles, won a small contract to pilot PIP assessments last year. In 2010, three G4S security guards were bailed after the death, whilst they were restraining him, of an Angolan refugee being deported from Heathrow.

Serco, another company with a heavy security presence, have been shortlisted for Northern Ireland. Amongst many other contracts, Serco run prisons, detention centres and immigration removal centres in the UK and abroad. In Australia, a Serco training manual is alleged to have taught employees how to use pain, including punches and kicks, to subdue asylum seekers.

Capita, which runs the Criminal Records Bureau on behalf of the Home Office and is invariably referred to as ‘Crapita’ by Private Eye, has also been shortlisted for all regions. The company has been involved in a number of less than successful public service contracts in the past, including Individual Learning Accounts which were subject to fraudulent claims on an unprecedented scale and which were shut down after just one year.

Other potential providers include Avanta, Ingeus Deloitte, APM UK, Reed In Partnership and Vertex.

A4E, currently mired in fraud investigations, did not make it through to any of the shortlists.


This is great all Security Companies and not one of them who has any form of Medical Experience. What a complete farce this will be as all it is an excuse to get as many people off DLA as they can. This way they can proudly say that they have reduced payments to the most needy in our society, the Disabled. DISGUSTING !!!

dx100uk
09-May-12, 01:14
is there an official link to this info?

dx

Kodiak
09-May-12, 10:50
http://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/news/latest-news/1552-8-may-newsletter?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Benefits and Work&utm_content=8+May+2012+newsletter (http://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/news/latest-news/1552-8-may-newsletter?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Benefits%20and%20Work&utm_content=8+May+2012+newsletter)

poppett
09-May-12, 13:06
Thank you for that interesting link, Kodiak. It has been shared on the facebook page "say no to PIP" campaign.

squidge
09-May-12, 13:23
Interesting letter to the guardian from Michael Meacher MP.

The Sunday Times Rich List, published today andcompulsory reading for anybody who wants to understand Britain’s power structure today, holds three extremely significant conclusions. One is that the 1,000 richest persons in the UK have increased their wealth by so much in the last 3 years – £155bn – that they themselves alone could pay off
the entire UK budget deficit and still leave themselves with £30bn to spare which should be enough to keep the wolf from the door.

The second, even more staggering, is that whilst the rest of the country is being crippled by the biggest public expenditureand benefits squeeze for a century, these 1,000 persons, containing many of the bankers and hedge fund and private equity operators who caused the financial crash in the first place, have not been made subject to any tax payback whatever commensurate to their gains. This is truly a government of the rich, by the rich, and for the
rich.

The third is that despite the biggest slump for nearly a century, the slowest and most anaemic recovery, and prolonged austerity stretching to a decade or more, this ultra-rich clique are now sitting on wealth even greater than
what they had amassed at the height of the boom just before the crash. Their combined wealth is now estimated at more than £414bn, equivalent to more than a third of Britain’s entire GDP. They include 77 billionaires and 23 others whose wealth exceeds £750m.Despite these massive repositories of wealth, these are some of the very people to whom Osborne gifted £3bn in his recent budget by cutting the 50p tax
rate. That measure alone gave 40,000 UK millionaires an extra average £14,000 a week, at the same time as those on very low incomes in receipt of working tax credits who couldn’t find an employer to increase their hours of work from 16 to 24 a week were being deprived in the same budget of £77 a week, around a third of their
income, through their tax credits being withdrawn.

In 1997 the wealth of the richest 1,000 amounted to £99bn. The increase in their wealth over the last 15 years has therefore been £315bn. If this increase in wealth were subject to capital gains tax at the current 28% rate, it would yield £88bn, and that alone would pay off more than 70% of the total budget deficit. However Osborne seems to share the notorious view of the New York heiress, Leonora Helmsley: “taxes are only for the little people”.

changilass
09-May-12, 13:35
If it stops folks swinging the lead then I'm all for it.

Truely disabled people have very little to fear.

poppett
09-May-12, 14:39
I am all in favour of weeding out the scroungers, however some horrifying cases have come to light where people in a coma are being told they have to attend for "fit for work " interview.

Watching the new welfare reforms taking place is like looking at a car crash waiting to happen.... the aftermath will be totally devastating and for some suicide the only way out.

Alrock
09-May-12, 14:45
....and for some suicide the only way out.

Do you think that would really bother Cameron, he'd probably (in private at least) see that as a win/win situation, not only are they off DLA but no JSA to pay out either.

poppett
09-May-12, 15:01
Personally I wouldn`t give them the satisfaction or the easy way out of paying, but for those without the mental strength to fight on...............that`s another story.

changilass
09-May-12, 18:17
I am all in favour of weeding out the scroungers, however some horrifying cases have come to light where people in a coma are being told they have to attend for "fit for work " interview..

If you are in a coma, not only would you not know about the letter being sent, but you would also be in hospital being looked after and fed and therefore not need DLA.

squidge
09-May-12, 18:33
If it stops folks swinging the lead then I'm all for it.

Truely disabled people have very little to fear.

As ever Changi that unfortunately is not the case. Take Blind people for example. Today under DLA if you have severe sight loss - are totally blind you automatically qualify for the higher rate of mobility allowance. Under the new rules, Blind people will not qualify automatically for mobility allowance, they will need to have additional needs to allow them to get the same rate of benefit. What is that all about? If you are blind you cant see and youneed help with getting around even without extra ailments.

The organisation MIND has pulled out of the government consultation on PIP because their concerns about the difficulties this benefit poses for people with mental health problems are not even being listened to. The lack of specialist understanding of mental health in the current system is well documented and yet none of the companies mentioned in this thread have any track record in medical assessment. As for getting rid of those who are swinging the lead - if they cant properly assess people then they will be no help in assessing whether they are suffereing real or imaginary ailments. They will allow as many charlatans as they will disallow genuine claimants. If the government wish to get rid of those defrauding the system they need to increase the resource they put into fraud investigation not create a swinging hammer that culls all in its path.

poppett
09-May-12, 19:21
My sister in law spent the last three weeks of her life at home, drifting in and out of consciousness and was hassled by the DWP and housing benefit officers at that time. It was a disgusting way for a dying woman to be treated, and sadly she is not alone. It was her choice to be discharged from hospital and cared for at home by her family.

Kodiak
10-May-12, 15:03
For the Initial Draft of Assessment Criteria for PIP Click the Link Below. It is in PDF and makes interesting reading.

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/pip-draft-assessment-criteria-note.pdf

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/pip-detailed-design-consultation.pdf

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/pip-assessment-thresholds-and-consultation.pdf
(http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/pip-draft-assessment-criteria-note.pdf)

poppett
10-May-12, 16:26
Thank you for the link(s) Kodiak. You are a wizard with them.

As well as the facebook page about PIP there is also one called Sparticus fighting for disability rights....if anyone is interested.

Liz
12-May-12, 19:35
If it stops folks swinging the lead then I'm all for it.

Truely disabled people have very little to fear.

The people 'swinging the lead' have nothing to fear! If they are taken off DLA at least they are able to work and get an income whereas the genuine cases can't.

Also it's not just disabled people it affects but those with chronic illnesses (like myself) who have to go through the ordeal of proving they need these benefits. :(

The Government aren't at all interested in helping people with disabilties/illness but just about saving money!!