View Full Version : Broadband comparisons
A guy in South Korea get this for 30 US Dollars a month with no download limit (that's nothing compared to some parts of the world):
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1209901998.png
I pay £33.80 a month for this with a 250GB a month download limit:
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1210452363.png
It just makes me want to firebomb BT.
your in rip off britain get used to it !
I thought that in the speed league table, the UK is ranked 27th out of 201 countries, with an average speed of 3.8Mbps.?
But then: "Asia dominates the list of fastest wired cities with more than half of the top 100 cities in Japan. Only 12 US cities make the list. All the top twenty cites were in either Japan or South Korea, with the exception of Umea, in Sweden, which was ranked 18th.Other European cities in the top 100 included Baden-Baden in Germany, Wageningen in the Netherlands and Timisoara in Romania. No UK city made it into the top 100.
Interesting report:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10786874
A guy in South Korea get this for 30 US Dollars a month with no download limit (that's nothing compared to some parts of the world):
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1209901998.png
I pay £33.80 a month for this with a 250GB a month download limit:
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1210452363.png
It just makes me want to firebomb BT.
Eh...then change supplier. I pay £25.50 for my home phone and broadband with unlimited downloads
northener
19-Mar-11, 23:18
A guy in South Korea get this for 30 US Dollars a month with no download limit (that's nothing compared to some parts of the world):
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1209901998.png
I pay £33.80 a month for this with a 250GB a month download limit:
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1210452363.png
It just makes me want to firebomb BT.
But your chum has a faster speed than 98% of his chums.
And you are slower than 59% of your chums.....;)
Eh...then change supplier. I pay £25.50 for my home phone and broadband with unlimited downloads
Most "unlimited" download deals, especially at that price, have to meet a "fair usage" limit of something like 10Gb a month, nowhere near the 250Gb the original poster was talking about.
Also, I think the difference in speed was the main issue here.
With our aging infrastructure I think it will be an awfully long time before we will see the speeds considered "normal" in Asia.
Most "unlimited" download deals, especially at that price, have to meet a "fair usage" limit of something like 10Gb a month, nowhere near the 250Gb the original poster was talking about.
Also, I think the difference in speed was the main issue here.
With our aging infrastructure I think it will be an awfully long time before we will see the speeds considered "normal" in Asia.
I regularly exceed 200Gb usage a month, and i've never had any problems resulting from a fair usage policy, and my speed is more or less pretty constant at 6 meg regardless of the time of day. It will on occasion drop to around 3.5/4meg at peak times, but that doesn't tend to happen very often.
I regularly exceed 200Gb usage a month, and i've never had any problems resulting from a fair usage policy, and my speed is more or less pretty constant at 6 meg regardless of the time of day. It will on occasion drop to around 3.5/4meg at peak times, but that doesn't tend to happen very often.
That's interesting to know.
What provider is that with out of interest?
I'm with AAISP, in my opinion there is no better supplier. Plus I value my IPv6 connectivity (practically no other supplier offers it) and it's a rare thing to talk to someone who doesn't read a script and not having to dumb myself down when talking to them. Also most unlimited suppliers traffic shape everything.
That 27th league table thing is about a year old at this point also. Coming 27th is kind of low in my opinion also considering Britain is supposed to be a modern developed/first world country.
That's interesting to know.
What provider is that with out of interest?
The Post Office. Their customer service was an absolute nightmare to deal with when i first signed up with them, i had all sort of problems setting up the account and was given incorrect information relating to the account nearly every time i had to call them. But eventually i got it all sorted out, and aside from when everyone's internet went doolally last month, i've not had to call them again.
Let's not bother comparing Broadband services with an Asian country. Their telecoms infrastructure is very different from ours. Most of the UK is still using BT landlines that were laid by Alexander Graham Bell and his pals a long time ago.
Can I have this one Mr? http://www.vassetidatatech.com/
..... Their telecoms infrastructure is very different from ours. Most of the UK is still using BT landlines that were laid by Alexander Graham Bell and his pals a long time ago.
I'm pretty sure that's the point the original poster was making.
I regularly exceed 200Gb usage a month, and i've never had any problems resulting from a fair usage policy, and my speed is more or less pretty constant at 6 meg regardless of the time of day. It will on occasion drop to around 3.5/4meg at peak times, but that doesn't tend to happen very often.
You must be fair ripping off films and music using that much!
You must be fair ripping off films and music using that much!
Nope, i subscribe to Blockbuster Online for all my movies, i didn't spend good money on a large screen Tv and Blu-Ray Home Cinema System to watch crappy quality pirated movies.
I'm pretty sure that's the point the original poster was making.
Yeah that was pretty much my point, they can't even fix the Edinburgh node properly they patched it up and left it hobbling along for a couple of months. That and we tend to be ignored up here. I'm reasonably sure I have one of the best connections in the area and that's still crap - that speed test was particularly slow compared to the norm.
It just makes me want to firebomb BT.
Anyone who advocats firebombing does not deserve to be taken seriously and I think their post should be removed
Anyone who advocats firebombing does not deserve to be taken seriously and I think their post should be removed
Good grief man, not everything said on here has to be taken literally.
Metalattakk
20-Mar-11, 13:20
Anyone who advocats firebombing does not deserve to be taken seriously and I think their post should be removed
Good grief man, not everything said on here has to be taken literally.
I notice the BT exchange in Thurso has a 'protective' scaffolding shield all around its base level. Seems they're taking this 'firebombing' threat pretty seriously. ;)
Anyone who advocats firebombing does not deserve to be taken seriously and I think their post should be removed
LOL evidently someone has never heard of hyperbole... either that or works for BT and is butthurt about the truth. It's people like you who make throwaway Twitter comments into court cases.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.