PDA

View Full Version : obama or cameron?


mrlennie
08-May-10, 19:04
Who would you rather have as el presidente?
ducati
08-May-10, 19:10
Cameron.....


This forum requires that you wait 60 seconds between posts. Please try again in 4 seconds. [lol]
cemmts
08-May-10, 19:12
Bush :)

George W
changilass
08-May-10, 19:15
As Cameron couldn't even manage a majority as Prime Minister, what is the point of the question?
mrlennie
08-May-10, 19:40
As Cameron couldn't even manage a majority as Prime Minister, what is the point of the question?
What is the point of the question?! So many points...just wondering.
joxville
08-May-10, 21:16
I'll opt for Obama just in case I'm accused of being racist. :eek:
RecQuery
08-May-10, 22:01
Well a PM and President are two different things for start, its not the same role by a different name. Also Obama hates the UK for some weird historical family reason. I rather liked Clinton as the best recent US President.
mrlennie
08-May-10, 22:07
what about the most recent UK president?
RecQuery
08-May-10, 22:11
what about the most recent UK president?

Obvious troll is obvious
mrlennie
08-May-10, 22:11
I kid I kid;)
crayola
09-May-10, 01:18
Who would you rather have as el presidente?
Obama of course.
pegasus
09-May-10, 04:03
Obama of course.

Must be a conspiracy!
John Little
09-May-10, 09:47
what about the most recent UK president?


That would be Cromwell.

He had his bad points. :confused
bekisman
09-May-10, 09:55
As Cameron couldn't even manage a majority as Prime Minister, what is the point of the question?

Tories 10,683,787
Labour 8,604,358
Libdem 6,827,938 :confused
Anfield
09-May-10, 18:37
Tories 10,683,787
Labour 8,604,358
Libdem 6,827,938 :confused

The electorate of the UK is 45,620,982.
If 10,683,787 voted for Tories
Then that means that only 23.4% of UK voters voted for them
Andfield
09-May-10, 18:41
And a mere 18.86% voted for New Liebour and therefore the Conservative Party is duly elected.
Eeven a dumb Scouser can work that out [lol]
ducati
09-May-10, 18:55
The electorate of the UK is 45,620,982.
If 10,683,787 voted for Tories
Then that means that only 23.4% of UK voters voted for them

Yes it would be much more convenient and easier to count if we all voted for the same party
Anfield
09-May-10, 20:06
Yes it would be much more convenient and easier to count if we all voted for the same party

I thought that they were all the same.
Phill
09-May-10, 21:27
Yes it would be much more convenient and easier to count if we all voted for the same party

So a dictatorship would be better really. Save on 650 MP's expenses & salaries straight away!
No hanging around deciding on how we sort a hung parliament, no worries of the peeps that couldn't vote & save a fortune on elections.

I could see myself as dictator, I'd be pretty cost effective too. I wouldn't claim any expenses, I'd just take a small salary....I think I could more than comfortably get by on 10 MP's salaries, a 90% saving still :eek:
ducati
09-May-10, 21:34
So a dictatorship would be better really. Save on 650 MP's expenses & salaries straight away!
No hanging around deciding on how we sort a hung parliament, no worries of the peeps that couldn't vote 7 save a fortune on elections.

I could see myself as dictator, I'd be pretty cost effective too. I wouldn't claim any expenses, I'd just take a small salary....I think I could more than comfortably get by on 10 MP's salaries, a 90% saving still :eek:

Impeccable logic, you have my vote :cool: